COP 28: Why global carbon pricing and trading platforms are false solutions Published: 17 November 2023 Analysis Article 6 of the Paris Agreement proposes global carbon pricing and offset mechanisms that will expand carbon trading to an unprecedented scale and jeopardize life on the planet. By Tamra Gilbertson and Tom BK Goldtooth
What to expect from carbon pricing – and what not Published: 11 March 2021 Commentary Carbon pricing has been dominating the public debate in recent months like hardly any other climate protection instrument. Stefanie Groll comments on the role of carbon pricing for ambitious climate protection. By Dr. Stefanie Groll
'Offsetting is better than doing nothing at all.' Published: 21 August 2017 Does offsetting contribute to climate protection or does it obscure the view of the real solutions?
'Public coffers are empty. This makes it all the more important to mobilise private capital for nature conservation.' Published: 21 August 2017 Do market-based instruments actually bring in that much money for nature conservation?
'Economic valuation of nature strengthens the 'polluter pays' principle.' Published: 18 August 2017 Does the valuation of nature really mean that those who destroy nature are forced to pay for it?
'Conventional regulatory instruments of nature conservation have failed. It is therefore important to give market-based instruments such as emissions trading a chance.' Published: 18 August 2017 Can market-based instruments replace conventional regulation in nature conservation?
'A mix of policy instruments is important to resolve environmental crises. Regulation will not be abolished just because emissions trading is also being used.' Published: 18 August 2017 Does emissions trading work in a mix of environmental policy instruments?
'REDD+ payments make forests more valuable standing than cut.' Published: 18 August 2017 So why does REDD+ not prevent deforestation?
Emissions trading: Strong players, feeble instruments Published: 18 November 2015 Trading in pollution permits has blossomed into a big business. The system has produced little benefit for the climate. Even so, the alternatives are barely discussed. A chapter from the Coal Atlas. By Eva Mahnke
Madness by Design: A Voluntary Climate Fee with No Climate Effect Published: 2 June 2015 It’s really gone that far: Sigmar Gabriel’s already minimal attempt to save Germany’s 2020 climate target of reducing emissions by 40% compared with those of 1990 has been so watered down that it is barely recognizable as a climate policy. By Lili Fuhr
